I need to go back in the archives and see where I can find an example of this but in the meantime to ask the obvious, is fossil verifying the signatures as part of the commit process or does fossil simply carry the data so the signature can be verified manually?
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:00:41PM +0200, Gour wrote: > On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:41:39 +0200 > Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > However... i don't want to move this to the trunk until i hear some > > feedback from the devs whether this is the optimal solution or whether > > something like a simple "PGP" would do. > > Sure, let's hear what others can say... > > > Sincerely, > Gour > > -- > As a strong wind sweeps away a boat on the water, > even one of the roaming senses on which the mind > focuses can carry away a man's intelligence. > > http://www.atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 > > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Powered by Lemote Fuloong against HTML e-mail X Loongson MIPS and OpenBSD and proprietary / \ http://www.mutt.org attachments / \ Code Blue or Go Home! Encrypted email preferred PGP Key 2048R/DA65BC04 _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
