@Richard: My guess is that the one of the prebuild binaries was compiled with MinGW > and the other with MSVC.
Just to provide some information so you can verify your guess: I've been using fossil since years now, (on XP, Vista, and now Win7,) and I updated regularly (though I can't be sure I got every single update). I never had this issue (nor any other - kudos!) until 1.25. So if the used compiler varied randomly, the assumption doesn't hold - as I surely would have hit at least some MinGW-compiled version. On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Richard Hipp - d...@sqlite.org < fossilscm.zoc.5877ad8d94.drh#sqlite....@ob.0sg.net> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:23 AM, <fossilscm....@xoxy.net> wrote: > >> Uhm, perhaps a naive "outsider" question, but how came the issue wasn't >> there before 1.25, if it's the differences in how the different shells >> process CLI arguments? Did the shells not remain the same in between? >> >> > My guess is that the one of the prebuild binaries was compiled with MinGW > and the other with MSVC. > > > -- > D. Richard Hipp > d...@sqlite.org > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
