On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Ron Aaron <r...@ronware.org> wrote: > >> Well, boy howdy! That seems to have cured it. >> > > :-D > > >> Somehow I must have done Something Bad, but not clear just what it may >> have been... >> > > Jan's hypothesis sounds better than anything i can come up with. It was, > in any case, a mismatch between expected and available RID values. The RID > values are transient, local to a specific copy of a repo. > You did a rebuild in the middle, too, which might have further changed the RIDs (they get regenerated during a rebuild, and not necessarily in the same order as before). The rebuild didn't _cause_ this, but might have exacerbated it (why is it that i can spell exacerbated on the first try, but can't remember how many pairs are in occasionally without the help of a spell checker?). -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
