For each person taking that time, there will be 1000 more not taking that time. That said, you are intentionally leaving a gap between human interaction and a library, and that gap is classic Unix scripting with stdout and stdin. Of course one could build a stable text interface automation friendly on top of the library.
Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> skrev: >On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Jakob Eriksson <ja...@aurorasystems.eu>wrote: > >> Of course you have no obligations but I think Fossil is getting more >> popular. That means you will break more people's scripts and expectations. >> Just something to consider. >> > >OTOH, anyone who takes the time to ask on the list what they can expect in >terms of consistency for their scripts would be told in advance: "don't >bother!" > >Fossil was never intended to be a "streaming tool," but instead a highly >interactive tool (e.g. some of its features are only accessible via the www >UI). That said, that's one of the niches libfossil hopes to eventually fill. > >-- >----- stephan beal >http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ >http://gplus.to/sgbeal > >_______________________________________________ >fossil-users mailing list >fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org >http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
