On Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:24:39 +0200, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Matt Welland <estifo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Losing the username in annotate command line is a big hit for me. I
don't
understand why that would be removed. Is this
0.02 Euros:
"blame" ==> with user name
"annotate" ==> with line number
Sounds like a good plan to me.
well, `blame' and `annotate' are frequently synonymous (at least in hg,
svn), so I would argue for keeping this behaviour (both
meaning the same thing), but making behaviour configurable via options,
maybe a subset of these (from hg help blame ...) or similar:
-u --user list the author (long with -v)
-f --file list the filename
-d --date list the date (short with -q)
-c --changeset list the changeset
-l --line-number show line number at the first appearance
and making, e.g., `-l' the default if that is the general preference
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
