On 20 Nov 2013 16:40, "Stephan Beal" <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Andy Bradford <amb-fos...@bradfords.org> wrote: >> >> Thus said Stephan Beal on Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:24:02 +0100: >> >> > If the patch is relatively small, please just paste it to the list >> > (don't attach it - attachments get stripped). i don't see the prior >> > mail explaining the problem - maybe it already contains the patch? >> >> The patch is already in Fossil: >> >> http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/e65162b4ad > > > Ah, i've missed so much traffic/context recently :(. > > IIRC, Richard tweaked that fix at some point: > > http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/vdiff?from=e65162b4ad664ae37&to=aef638b61003fcf2&sbs=1 > > search that for main.c and you'll see that line 1185 from e65162 was removed later on. > > i.e. the patch for Gentoo should probably look a little bit different now. As for how best to feed that into their build process... no idea :/. > > -- > ----- stephan beal > http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ > http://gplus.to/sgbeal > "Since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
Considering fossil releases are relatively rare and fossil trunk is generally in a good state, I would suggest picking the current trunk head and update the version on a regular basis if fixes that are of interest for Gentoo users are merged with trunk.
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
