On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
> * Richard Hipp: > > > The silly requirement of some distributions that *everything* must be a > > shared library irks me beyond words. I hate having to support > > --disable-internal-sqlite, and I hate having to add silly work-arounds in > > the code to accommodate distributions trying to use an older SQLite with > a > > newer Fossil. This impedes progress and introduces bugs. It's a > lose-lose > > situation. And yet the distributions are dogmatic on this point. > > Uhm, does POSIX file locking work correctly if there are multiple > copies of SQLite within the same process (assuming that there are no > symbol collisions/interpositions)? > No it does not. But what does that have to do with static vs. dynamic linkage? -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
