On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski <l...@maxnet.org.pl>wrote:
> > On Jan 9, 2014, at 16:00 , Martin S. Weber wrote: > > >> But I want Fossil to follow the latest SQLite alphas, not the latest > SQLite > >> stables. That's the whole point: Fossil supports SQLite as a test > >> platform. SQLite stable has already been thoroughly vetted and tested > and > >> there is little point in testing it further. I want Fossil to run with > the > >> latest SQLite on trunk to smoke out bugs early. > > > > ...but fossil in itself is a pretty awesome piece of software, that's > expected > > by its users to be stable -- at least for releases. > > I second this view, Fossil is definitely valuable on its own merit. > As such, its stable versions should not contain alpha-quality code from > other projects. > SQLite alphas are more robust that "stables" of most other software projects. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
