On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 18:47:54 -0400 Ron W <ronw.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I looked at AsciiDoc. In theory, it's nice, but it appears to have > gathered a huge number of features over the years. It really appears > to try to be "LaTeX Light". As it was already said, readability counts here. > Also, it uses [ and ] for purposes other than "wiki links" (as many > wiki mark-ups use) , so using it as an alternative to either Fossil's > native wiki mark-up or to mark-down would be awkward for many users. My intention was not to suggest using AsciiDoc as 'alternative' to the Fossil's wiki (I had enough in the past when asking for markdown support), but only if there is some simple way to make it render AsciiDoc documents (for those already using such markup) via Asciidoctor.js. Sincerely, Gour -- >From wherever the mind wanders due to its flickering and unsteady nature, one must certainly withdraw it and bring it back under the control of the self. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
