On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Philip Bennefall <phi...@blastbay.com> wrote:
> whether it should really say branch rather than tags. Is this a bug, or is > it really meant to be branch rather than tags? > It's probably just an oversight. IIRC, the --tag option to commit was added relative recently (within the past year), and in my experience most people provide the message on the command line, so they never see that. i honestly can't remember the last time i let an scm start up an editor to type in my commit message (several years, at the very least). -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
