On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Andy Bradford <amb-fos...@bradfords.org> wrote:
> There certainly is an argument that there should be, but how should it > be implemented? And how much of the underlying tags implementation > should it expose? For example, what if I want the tag to not be symbolic > and propagating? > In libfossil i went with the easy route: if the first character is one of +/-/*, then treat it as the appropriate tag type. i "cannot imagine" that any "sensible person" would use such characters as the first character of a tag, but... stranger things have happened. > Or maybe people who want more than a symbolic tag just use fossil tag? > +1 to that. The ability to add them at commit-time is a bit of a "bonus points" feature, IMO. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
