Stephan Beal decía, en el mensaje "Re: [fossil-users] Pessimism about CommonMark in fossil" del domingo, 28 de septiembre de 2014 13:45:58: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Natacha Porté <nata...@instinctive.eu > <mailto:nata...@instinctive.eu>> wrote: > But this is still about disambiguating "Markdown", without looking at > any other wiki or markup format. > > If it is incompatible with _any_ existing Markdown dialects, then it is > effectively a competing format. If there are over 2 dozen slightly different > implementations, what are the real chances of getting those two dozen projects > to consolidate on one standard? And then what are the chances that all of them > will change their parsers to all work identically (which seems like quite a > waste of effort, to have 20+ implementations which all work identically). > > i still predict utter failure ;).
My 0.02 Credits: didn't the name "CommonMark" (and not *Markdown) had to be created because the creator of Markdown himself disowned the effort and DEMANDED that the name "Markdown" wasn't used? More reason to agree with Stephan's prediction. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
