On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 20:59:52 -0400 Ron W <ronw.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For a project that follows the recommended convention of directories > named "trunk", "branches" and "tags" - or clearly identifies its > convention - creating branches (and tagged commits) in Fossil should > not be too hard. If the convention cannot be identified, then no > branches would be created. In any case, my opinion is that having SVN <---> Fossil is much more interested than Git <---> Fossil 'cause, imho, with Fossil one can make very familiar/similar workflow like the one used with SVN. Sincerely, Gour -- A person who is not disturbed by the incessant flow of desires — that enter like rivers into the ocean, which is ever being filled but is always still — can alone achieve peace, and not the man who strives to satisfy such desires. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
