On 10/28/14, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Ron W <ronw.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Maybe could be as simple as adding the relevant artifact IDs to the shun >> list and rebuilding. (Though that would be rather slow (which is not >> necessarily a bad thing for this feature)). >> >> > Yep. Just be VERY CAREFUL that you don't add an artifact that is also used > in some other check-out that you want to keep, because after you shun it > will be gone forever.
For that reason (and the extra baggage of the added element to the shun list) I think that shun (proper) is not the ideal long-term solution. > -- > D. Richard Hipp > d...@sqlite.org > _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
