2015-01-22 17:50 GMT+01:00 Ron W <ronw.m...@gmail.com>:
> So, a "bug" was promoted to a feature?
Hm, yes, that's one way to look at it.
Actually, having more than one "initial" commit is not
a bug. The only problem was that the fossil code
assumed in some places that there was only one.
The bug was that fossil mis-behaved when there
were no "initial" commits, and therefore always
created one just to be sure.
Since fossil 0.30, the initial commit is not special
any more. It's a normal commit which simply has
no ancestors. And all restrictions on how many
of them there should be are gone. It's up to
you how to use that.
Regards,
Jan Nijtmans
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
