Which timeline graph do you prefer: (1) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=ci&nomo=0 (2) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=ci&nomo=1
The difference is in the merge lines. Other examples: (1) https://core.tcl.tk/tk/timeline?y=ci&nomo=0 (2) https://core.tcl.tk/tk/timeline?y=ci&nomo=1 (1) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=ci&b=2015-02-26&nomo=0 (2) https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=ci&b=2015-02-26&nomo=1 The current default display is as in (1). When there are many parallel branches in a graph, Fossil reduces the spacing between the vertical lines of the graph (called "rails" in the code) and when the rails get really close together, Fossil automatically switches to style (2) because that is clearly easier to read when the graph is scrunched together. (See, for example, https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?y=ci&railpitch=11). But after making that enhancements, I notice that style (2) seems less cluttered, and so now I'm wondering if it ought to be the default. FWIW: The nomo= and railpitch= query parameters are experimental and will be removed, probably before the next release. So do not become attached to them. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
