On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:53:36AM -0500, Andy Goth wrote: > On 3/11/2015 12:15 AM, jungle Boogie wrote: > > I created a test repo with a few commits: > > > > The commit of the 100 MB files took about 300 seconds but this ran on > > a single core 512MB-1gig RAM machine. > > > > I know this is unscientific but it seems fossil handled the large > > pretty commits well. If this were done on a machine with an SSD and > > some more RAM, it may not take quite as long. > > Please try again but with repo-cksum turned off, see what difference it > makes.
It should cut the size about in half, but a better question would be what "openssl speed sha1" gives for the largest block size. Joerg _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
