On 13/03/15 19:50, David Mason wrote:
You have a typo in your post:
Thanks, corrected.
"only projects I use Git on are my own"
pretty sure you meant Fossil in that phrase.
Thanks, yes. I prefer to use Fossil, but when I take over something that
is already version controlled it invariably uses Git, and usually Github.
On 13 March 2015 at 08:40, Graeme Pietersz <gra...@pietersz.net> wrote:
On 13/03/15 08:17, jungle Boogie wrote:
Yes, I'm being optimistic about the userbase but we must agree Fossil
to much easier and friendlier to use.
Not always. My reply to this turned out to be rather long and a bit of rant,
so I turned it into a blog post. I hope its not spammy to post a link here
rather than paste it into an email:
http://pietersz.co.uk/2015/03/fossil-vs-git
The short version is, Fossil is easier to use than Git, but it is not easier
to use than Github.
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
