On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 1:05 PM, James Moger <james.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is no *direct* analog of the Fossil fork feature, although you could > crudely simulate one, I suppose, with server-side refs. > Forks are not a feature, just an "unnamed" branch. I use the quotes because a fork could happen in a named branched, so "unnamed" in that context would mean not having a new name. Such forks can occur in any DVCS. Fossil just doesn't block them during a push/pull/sync operation. (And other DVCSs don't call them forks.)
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
