On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Jonathan Hankins < jhank...@homewood.k12.al.us> wrote:
> First of all, is this the intended behavior? > The --ignore option behaves as documented. > Secondly, is this common enough to warrant complicating the processing of > the existing --ignore option? > I envisioned it as a different but related option: If the introducer is -- then use the existing ignore processing. If ++ then use new ignore processing. > If yes and yes, then syntax you propose seems unnatural to me. How about: > > --ignore +<CSG> (a la NET-SNMP mibdirs handling, maybe allow for -<CSG> > too) > While I like this syntax, it seems to me that this is more complex than my proposal. A possible compromise would be to allow a single + (or - ) as a prefix to the list. Though, if there is code whose license is compatible with Fossil's license, and it's not too much work to incorporate into Fossil, it would be more flexible.
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
