Le mercredi 13 mai 2015 à 02:36:24, Warren Young a écrit : > On May 13, 2015, at 1:37 PM, Stéphane Aulery <saul...@legtux.org> wrote: > > > > I use fossil 1.29 on Debian > > Recent versions of Fossil know “fossil help -a”, which fixes the > discrepancy you have found. Perhaps 1.29 also knows “fossil help -a”?
Yes, it knows it. Sorry, I did not see the -a option. These sub options seem counterproductive. They are not all named in the result of "fossil help". Especially that "fossil help -a" really does not show all, while "fossil help -" really shows everything (except web pages). > While I do enjoy using binary packages myself, I only use Fossil binary > packages to download the current code from fossil-scm.org, which I compile > and install, then I remove the binary package. It is an option to consider. I could not find how to report this bug to the tracker. This is subject to the Agreement as well as the contribution of code? -- Stéphane Aulery _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
