On Jun 2, 2015, at 2:21 AM, Jan Nijtmans <jan.nijtm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It turns out not to be a gcc optimization bug after all: the optimization > is very valid
According to what standard?? What I see in 30af11d4 should be legal even in C89. If you are right and azView must have function scope in order to be available on the last line it’s used in that function, version 30af11d4 shouldn’t even compile. I’m glad you found a way to placate the compiler, but brushing it off as “not an optimization bug” means GCC still has a bug waiting to bite someone else. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
