If I understand things right, this is a diff against the undo buffer, so I suggest this alternative:
fossil diff --undo-buffer BR, Johan El 13/9/2015 5:39, "Lonnie Abelbeck" <li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com> escribió: > > On Sep 11, 2015, at 7:19 PM, Scott Robison <sc...@casaderobison.com> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Steve Stefanovich <s...@stef.rs> wrote: > > Clever, but awkward in my opinion; the first place to look for such a > feature would be under diff command. At least for me, that is. > > > > My vote is for diff --from|--to undo, where 'undo' is a special tag, > same as 'ckout' in different context. I think it fits in such paradigm > nicely. > > > > The person who names branches 'undo' can be perhaps warned in the > command help to use the hash instead. > > > > S. > > > > Here is the stash version of diff: > > fossil stash diff ?STASHID? > > fossil stash gdiff ?STASHID? > > > > Why not do it the same way for undo? It seems to be most in line with > precedent. Perhaps because undo doesn't currently have subcommands, just > options. Still, it would be the most intuitive thing based on existing > practice. > > > > -- > > Scott Robison > > +1 > > Editing the "stash" help added to "undo" would look something like... > > -- snippet -- > > fossil undo diff ?DIFF-OPTIONS? > fossil undo gdiff ?DIFF-OPTIONS? > > Show diffs of the current working checkout and what that > checkout would be if "undo" were applied. > > SUMMARY: > fossil undo > fossil undo [g]diff ?DIFF-OPTIONS? > > -- > Lonnie > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
