On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:01:09PM -0400, Ron W wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Abilio Marques <abili...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
> 
> > As far as I can see, binary files get uploaded into a web server using
> > PUT, and then a reference is made into the repo. That way git doesn't deal
> > with useless DIFFs of such files. Then, when a checkout is made, it
> > downloads the file over http/https. Seems like a neat solution.
> >
> > I guess that fossil users with a bunch of local repos (like myself)
> > wouldn't benefit if they had to load a web server. But for other people,
> > perhaps... Perhaps if instead of a web server, the file just gets copied in
> > a directory... I don't know...
> >
> 
> Fossil's internal diffing algorithm handles binary files quite well. Also,
> I recall reading somewhere that Fossil is able to determine when just
> storing the new content would be more efficient.

Same for git really.

Joerg
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to