" Even with fossil, I am having trouble justifying why the hassle is worth the effort. " Sorry, but the alternatives (I have a Halloween shudder at the thought)
are way more effort in the long run. I agree, merging is difficult when there are conflicts. But, Fossil and others show your options to proceed. You are in control. On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:08 PM, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 30 October 2015 at 10:56, Scott Doctor <sc...@scottdoctor.com> wrote: > > That is my experience with all VCS systems. Even with fossil, I am having > > trouble justifying why the hassle is worth the effort. > > > I version control config files for apps, .vimrc files, and small > scripts just so I can see what changes I make between them and for > faster setup on new machines. In my very simple setup, I see clear > benefits of using version control (Fossil and rcs) on these files. I > can't imagine how serious software dev would work without some form of > version control. > > -- > ------- > inum: 883510009027723 > sip: jungleboo...@sip2sip.info > xmpp: jungle-boo...@jit.si > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
