On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Eduard <eduard.c.dumitre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/20/2015 04:06 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > >> >> $ f status >> tags: pending-review >> (user: andybradford) >> $ f up -n >> UPDATE src/add.c >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> updated-to: d83fc58dead2d03428a763b0890b8b5fbffb7957 2014-01-09 >> 13:17:23 UTC >> tags: pending-review >> comment: Add comments to better explain what it happening for the >> out-of-tree check >> in the "add" command. (user: drh) >> changes: 1 file modified. >> $ f up -n pending-review >> updated-to: 2a1d7e0efc0f048b495815bac577d3c0f5c4d9a6 2015-10-20 >> 08:14:11 UTC >> tags: pending-review >> comment: Docker build "release" by default. Meant for upcoming >> Fossil release. (user: >> jan.nijtmans) >> changes: 322 files modified. >> > > Aha, now i see the problem. i don't have a solution. In such a crazy case, > using the UUID is really the only sane choice. > > So uh is there any chance of adding an alias for this (@drh)? It's easy to > write a shell script that does it, but it seems to me that this is > something that should really be within fossil itself (since not every > fossil user necessarily knows how to write shell scripts). > i don't think an alias is needed - simply leave out the branch name when you do 'update' (or pass the name 'current'). Then, according to the code-level docs, if you leave out a name or use 'current', it will look for a direct ancestor. Try it with 'current' and see if that solves your case. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
