On 12/15/15, Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Dec 15, 2015, at 5:54 AM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: >> >> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10737131 > > Could someone who understands “git rebase” weigh in on that thread? People > are claiming that “fossil shun” means there is no difference between Git and > Fossil. > > Either my understanding of fossil shun is just as weak as my understanding > of git rebase, or this is a false equivalency, and we can’t have [people > getting away with being wrong on the Internet][1]. :) >
Shun does *not* provide the equivalent of rebase. Claims that it does are misinformed. I think people are making a bigger deal out of this than it deserves. The main different between Fossil and Git with regard to rebasing is summarized well in the docs: "Git remembers what you should have done whereas Fossil remembers what you actually did." -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
