Thus said "Gaurav M. Bhandarkar" on Thu, 17 Dec 2015 11:04:06 +0530:
> Normal merge or rebase both "enables" fast-forward merges. But the > advantage "rebase-before-ff-merge" has is that it avoids other(s) extra > "merge commits" that you would have done to get your branch updated with > changes from remote. Among the reasons that brought me to Fossil, over Git, was that there are fewer surprises in how it behaves and that it was so much easier to use. I've never had to worry about ``rebase'' with Fossil. Indeed, I find that I use Git more like I use Fossil. Do I need the ``power'' that Git supposedly has? I've always felt more in control with Fossil. Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400000005672ef59 _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
