Hi Dave. Don't fret! I'm not attributing this to malice or blaming -you-, but something does look strange to me (on my local copy of the repo).
Cheers, -bch On 1/5/16, David Vines <d...@zombi.eclipse.co.uk> wrote: > On 05/01/2016 18:53, bch wrote: >> How did we end up w/ dave.vines' completely untagged (no branch) >> commits in the repository (or am I misreading what these are?) ? >> >> ref: >> /info/b208bf75777604dc >> /timeline?u=dave.vines&c=2016-01-05+10%3A12%3A56&nd&n=200 > > If I've messed this up, I do most humbly apologise and want to fix it > ASAP - but I see this as tagged as "technoteattachcli", at least in the > fossil-scm.org web ui. > > One curious aspect I do see is that the web ui has the annotation of > "unpublished" against the creation of the branch. I did start by have a > private branch which I then published - I do wonder if this might be > part of the problem. > > David > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
