On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2016, at 7:20 PM, Scott Robison <sc...@casaderobison.com> > wrote: > > > > As it turns out, this wasn't a great plan. > > I agree. I even dislike checking configure scripts generated by autoconf > and similar into repos. > > (Please, hold the replies. I already know the justifications. I just > don’t agree.) > > > Since I'm using Windows, I was inclined to just use a batch file > > *wince* > > I wonder if it would be cleaner in Stephan Beal’s f-s2sh language? > It would have been cleaner in just about anything. But there was a principle involved, namely bending Windows to my will. Note: I have cygwin installed on my machine, so it's not like I couldn't have used another more posixy tool. But this worked adequately for me. > > fossil update next > > That’s worth reading this post all by itself. I knew about most of the > other special tags, but not that one. Thanks! > > I assume “next” ignores branches, so that rewriting the repo by stepping > through it with “next” in a loop will prune all the branches? > I would assume so, but don't know as I had no branches in this repo and no repo with branches from which I wanted to excise any history. This was a pretty special case. :) -- Scott Robison
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
