On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Michael Richter <ttmrich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I know that every time I mention this I get silently, perhaps even > hostilely, ignored, but really guys, why not just use fsl for your > customization needs? Colourizing output is in the cookbook: > http://fossil.0branch.com/fsl/wiki?name=Cookbook, along with lots of > other nifty tricks like aliasing, adding commands (like workflow-based ones > I've done for my stuff), etc. It really is a nifty little package and I > don't get the hostility (or at least utter apathy) it generates in the > Fossil community. > > I look forward to the "ignore the very existence of this message" that is > traditional each time I bring it up. > fwiw, i think you've misconstrued the conventional silence. i've always intended it as, "whew! We dodged that bullet again!" Yes, colorization is commonly-request feature, but is also not trivial to do portably, which is probably why relatively few people are interested in implementing it. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do." -- Bigby Wolf
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
