HI, 2016-08-13 19:45 GMT+02:00 Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org>:
> But you still have not made your case for why growth of the stash id > is a bad thing. I know, it would be purely cosmetic. What is largest possible stash id on 32 bit systems? My stash ID's after testing are now $ fos pool 6: [7ad8230273fa79] on 2016-02-15 23:04:46 (comments removed) 8: [7ad8230273fa79] on 2016-02-15 23:17:34 10: [7ad8230273fa79] on 2016-02-16 03:32:31 11: [8ed01e8021d415] on 2016-02-26 04:09:25 12: [b06cd631f18043] on 2016-03-07 23:06:20 13: [57f1eaecb80dcf] on 2016-03-27 23:28:45 and next would being 23 (in the pristine version). Maybe I use this function even incorrect and should discard the slots faster. They contains/keeps small changes here and there... Whatever: It's not my intention to belittle your work. I try my best from a luser's perspective. Thanks for your time and work, Kain _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users