On 2/6/17, Richard Hipp <[email protected]> wrote: > > That is correct, and it is by design. Fossil allows any number of > branches to share the same name.
On second thought, perhaps it would be worthwhile to enhance Fossil so that it issued a warning if you include a --branch argument on "fossil commit" with the same name as an existing open branch, and actually fail the commit unless the --force flag is also present. Perhaps such a change would make Fossil easier to transition to from other systems. Does anybody else having any feelings one way or another about this? -- D. Richard Hipp [email protected] _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
