On 13/02/2017 06:47, Artur Shepilko wrote:
>> * no more silent renaming of master vs trunk [1]
>
> "fossil import --rename-trunk" already allows a choice for a Fossil
> branch name to receive Git's "master" branch.
> A bug was missed in src/import.c:~567 if( fossil_strcmp(z,
> "master")==0 ) z = "trunk";
>
> In src/import.c this option is stored in gimport.zTrunkName, so for
> the purposes it should be used there instead of the ggit.zMasterName
> introduced.
> It can be something to this effect:
> if( fossil_strcmp(z, "master")==0 ){
> gg.zBranch = fossil_strdup(gimport.zTrunkName);
> }else{
> gg.zBranch = fossil_strdup(z);
> }
>
> Makes sense?
No, not really.
--rename-master renames master
--rename-trunk renames trunk
We should strive to keep the command line UI sane.
In both fossil and git, it's possible to have both master and trunk
branches.
>> * tag comments are imported and exported [2]
>
> ?? How does one enter a tag comment from the Fossil command line or
> this is an import/export only feature?
Currently this is only import/export changes.
I might be able to modify the command line to accept a comment for a tag.
> Fossil tags are kinda dated
> "lightweight" Git tags, yet unlike Git multiple commits can have the
> same tag. Does this suggest also same tags but also with different
> comments?
The git-fast-import format does not support "lightweight" tags, only
anointed ones. However, the way I've implemented it in Fossil should
allow multiple tags to have different comments. I have not yet addressed
the issue of git itself not accepting matching tags for different commits.
Roy
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
