I believe so.

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017, 11:13 Martin Gagnon <eme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:02:11PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> > On 11/29/17, Jacob MacDonald <jaccar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Ah, I see. It seems strange to me that the policy didn't get set when I
> > > cloned. How can I avoid the same thing in the future and is there any
> way
> > > to change the artifacts in the local repository to SHA3?
> >
> > There is no good way to change historical artifacts from SHA1 to SHA3.
> > The best policy is to let sleeping dogs lay and move on using SHA3 in
> > the future.  You can do that by running "fossil hash-policy sha3" on
> > the local side, where you do your "fossil commit" commands.  That will
> > cause all future check-ins to be SHA3.
> >
> > I don't know how the server side got set to sha3-only.  That's never
> > come up before.
>
> Chisel have an option to upload a repository file, may be it was set to
> shun-sha1 locally before to get uploaded to Chisel ?
>
> Is that what happened Jacob ?
>
> --
> Martin G.
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to