Am 16.02.2018 um 14:26 schrieb Gilles:
>
> Thanks much. I tried Fuel-2.0.0-beta3-win32.zip,but it fails opening a
> repo (works OK with the last official build, ie. 2.0.0 from 2015):
> ===========
> > fossil open D:/Temp/Fossil.test/repo.fossil
> SQLITE_ERROR: near "(": syntax error
> SQLITE_CORRUPT: database corruption at line 105609 of [2ef4f3a5b1]
> SQLITE_CORRUPT: malformed database schema (artifact) - near "(":
> syntax error
> D:\Apps\Fuel.Fossil.GUI\2.0.0-beta3\fossil.exe: malformed database
> schema (artifact) - near "(": syntax error
> SELECT value FROM config WHERE name='allow-symlinks'
> ===========
>
I've never tried the beta zip. Which version of fossil is packaged in
there? Resp. which binary do you have in your path. If it's a binary
from 2015 it might still be fossil.exe 1.35 or something. Such an old
version cannot open new repositories any more. Just replace it with you
own copy of fossil.exe> Personally, I'd like a way to compare two revisions for a given file: > After right-clicking a file > History, it could show a list of the > revisions, and let the user pick two, before launching WinMerge. Then, > there should be a way to either check out the same file or another > file, and copy/paste code. Combined with a good text search, this > would be an easy way to re-use some code snippets. I find Fuel very > nice to use. Sounds reasonable. I think we should carefully decide what to implement within fuel and what to leave to the features already available within fossil. In your case I could imagine having the list to select the version to be provided by fuel, but the rest to fossil features (e.g. opening a local diff tool with the right versions via a fossil.exe and leave the merge feature to the configured text/gui merge tool). Just some initial food for discussion ;-) I see Fuel as a start point for on-and-off / entry-level users of fossil. Therefore I'd focus on feature for this type of clientele. the power features of fossil are still avail via command line for the resp. power users. E.g. I installed for my son who just starts programming under Win/Linux and cross-platform fossil w/ fuel is MUCH easier than git :-). Opinions on this one anywone? > > Maybe we could create an Etherpad so people can vote for features, > among all the commands available from Fossil: That sound also like a good idea, at least we could give it a try. We could get a prioritization for the dev work out of this. > > Weird. Here it is on another site : https://ibb.co/mWEQ1S This one worked! Happy Coding, Chris _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
