On Jun 14, 2018, at 9:34 PM, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > > maybe full SMTP support in Fossil wouldn’t be justified, and it would require > integration with a local MTA instead, to push the burden off to the other > component. That wouldn’t be very Fossil, but it would be pragmatic.
On second thought, that’s not true. Fossil currently does not try to implement the client or server sides of TLS. It delegates to OpenSSL for the former and to an HTTPS proxy for the latter. This may be another area where Fossil is right to delegate. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
