On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Andre Engels <andreeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > That doesn't change my point, it's just a matter of scale... Suppose > there's a chapter in Georgia, and one for Kentucky and Tennessee. Then > some people come around and start on a chapter for the southeast. > That's going to be a quite strange assortment of states they're going > to represent.
So it's a problem if a chapters geographical area is "strange"? Or maybe the biggest concern is that a chapter may be named in such a way that's confusing to non-members? If these are our biggest problems concerning the hypothetical development of subnational chapters, then I am relieved. If we are lucky enough to have 4 active chapters in the south east region of the USA, then this is quite a good problem to have! --Andrew Whitworth _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
