2009/1/20 geni <geni...@gmail.com>: > 4(c)(iii) is irrelevant. The foundation not the licensor and the URL > is on top of other attribution and copyright stuff. The only way > attribution methods can be controlled through CC-BY-SA-3.0 is through > 4(c)(i).
You are making an unsupported assertion. CC-BY-SA is precisely structured (as are all BY licenses) to support attribution URIs; that is why 4(c)(iii) exists. CC metadata standards allow for attribution URIs [1], and when you license a work through the CC website, you can specify an attribution URI as an alternative to a name. You are confused by the attribution parties clause; it has nothing to do with the explicit provisions for URIs. [1] http://creativecommons.org/ns [2] http://creativecommons.org/license/ -- Erik Möller Deputy Director, Wikimedia Foundation Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l