On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 2009/1/24 Anthony <wikim...@inbox.org>: > > Mike took us off on a tangent when he insisted that the concept of "moral > > rights" was a purely legal construction, but up until then I thought > things > > were going well. > > Or you went off on a tangent when you started talking about moral > rights in a more general sense that was strictly relevant to the > discussion. Either way, a tangent was certainly gone off on. My point of view is that the proposed license update is a violation of the moral rights of the contributors. If Mike is going to deny that moral rights exist in the first place, then I feel the need to explain that they do. I guess I could just ignore this point, as rather self-evidently false, but I was also interested in why he felt that way. Anyway, I don't know where this leaves us. At least one moderator has suggested that this needs to stop, so it's unclear whether it's possible to discuss this issue at all. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l