On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Bence Damokos <bdamo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Sam Johnston <s...@samj.net> wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:43 PM, geni <geni...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > 2009/2/3 Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>: >> >> Hoi, >> >> The economics of it are such that there is a real fine balance between >> cheap >> >> and expensive. I positvely hate text on my posters. Printing on the >> back is >> >> two prints and that IS expensive. My point has been and still is that >> it is >> >> nice to come up with "solutions". They have to be practical in the real >> >> world. If a proposed solution adds enough overhead, the effect will be >> that >> >> it will not be accepted a solution. >> > >> > Assuming posters are not for large scale public display sending the >> > credits on a separate bit of paper would probably meets the >> > requirements. >> >> I'm not aware of any print-on-demand providers who facilitate the >> sending of arbitrary documentation with prints so my ability to reuse >> is still unnecessarily restricted. >> >> Sam > > According to this [1], the Wikiposter service on the French Wikipedia provides attribution by printing a separate page with the license details. In reply to Huib Laurens: is this the/a right way to attribute? [1] http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projet:Impression/en#Frequently_asked_questions Best regards, Bence Damokos _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l