On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hoi, > When the use case of the Simple Wikipedia is better understood, it may even > make room for more simple projects as in simple projects in the biggest > languages. > Thanks., > GerardM
If anyone is interested, I believe the other language most suited to such a project would be French, because of its lingua franca status in large parts of the developing world. Thanks, Pharos > 2009/2/25 Cary Bass <c...@wikimedia.org> > >> Ray Saintonge wrote: >> > Brian Salter-Duke wrote: >> >> However my central point that a discussion of something as important as >> >> closing one of our most important projects in a way that few know about >> >> it remains. The !vote is 42:102. We get more at en:WP on a RFA. >> > >> > A further argument against having this principally discussed on Meta is >> > that those who are best served by Simple do not have the language skills >> > to participate fully in a discussion where there is unlimited use of >> > language. >> > >> > Ec >> >> In light of that, I understand that there is some kind of simple >> wikipedia usage among the OLPC (One Laptop per Child) distribution. >> Perhaps someone could clarify, but if this is the case, then that would >> make the likelihood that this already failing proposal would pass even >> more remote. >> >> Cary Bass >> >> _______________________________________________ >> foundation-l mailing list >> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l >> > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l