On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Alex <mrzmanw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Chad wrote: >> >> While working with OTRS, I actually sent several articles through AfD. And I >> typically didn't announce that it was an OTRS thing, so as to let the >> community >> judge the article on its own merits. This would actually be a decent policy >> to >> follow: encourage OTRS respondents to send the marginally notable through >> the normal AfD process (like any other) and allow those in the community >> more equipped to deal with deletion/BLP issues handle it. >> > > This assumes that both of those groups are the same. Many people > involved in the deletion processes are rather unconcerned with BLP > issues (or things like sourcing and NPOV, as long as its notable), and > many people concerned about BLPs don't involve themselves in the > deletion process. > > -- > Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
Those that involve themselves in BLP matters should perhaps frequent AFD more often. Provided that is still how we delete articles that aren't speedyable. -Chad _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
