On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Michael Snow <wikipe...@verizon.net> wrote: > Given that background, I would conclude that neither of the current > options is desirable, and we need to develop a new Wiktionary logo.
Yes, that's what Cary brought up. :-) On <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiktionary/logo/refresh> people have the option of commenting on whether or not they think we should use the 'classic' logo, the 'tile' logo, or design a new logo. He specifically set it up so that "If none of the three options gains a clear majority at the end of the second week of voting, then [he] propose[s] the vote default to option three." > My own suggestion would be to use > individual blocks but to have them be like type pieces from a printing > press. Though actual proposals for new logos will be accepted later (once it is decided how things will work), you can leave a comment about how you feel here: <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiktionary/logo/refresh#Begin_from_Scratch> :-) -- Casey Brown Cbrown1023 --- Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent to this address will probably get lost. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
