On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Nathan <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com >> wrote: > >> Hoi, >> When you make illustration not visible you effectively remove them. It is a >> cop out to continue and say that it is *others *that can decide that they >> do >> not want to be informed, that they are willing that other people are at >> risk >> because essential images are not readily available. It is a cop out because >> this risk is ignored. Ignored because it is convenient >> >> As to BLP, the images that I am talking about do not identify people. They >> show what is essentially a detail and a penis or a vagina may be part of >> this. >> >> When the issue is about people using images in places where they are not >> appropriate, then deal with that issue. Do not confuse this with the >> legitimate use of essential but problematic images. >> Thanks, >> GerardM >> >> >> > Honestly, this tangent has very little if anything to do with the issue that > we ought to be discussing. No one has proposed removing or hiding images > depicting medical conditions. If you want to argue against something that no > one is arguing for, you should start a new thread.
There are many separate issues here. Samuel Klein listed three in an earlier email. -- John Vandenberg _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
