Hoi,
There are two things to consider;
- when you develop using the Wave protocol the license covers your work
- Wave is based on the Google Web Toolkit
The Google Web Toolkit has a different license, it is licensed under the
Apache license. So again I do not share your opinion that we can not use the
technology involved. I will say that we cannot contribute back. So I think
the uncooperative shoe is on our foot not Google's.
Thanks,
GerardM
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/makinggwtbetter.html#licensing
2009/6/2 Lars Aronsson <l...@aronsson.se>
> Gerard Meijssen wrote:
>
> > Lars PLEASE read the license before you comment.
>
> Of course I have read the short license text at
> http://www.waveprotocol.org/patent-license
>
> It says that as long as we follow Google's protocol standard, they
> won't sue us for infringing on their patents ("patents necessarily
> infringed by implementation of this specification"). Oh, how very
> generous. But what if we want to implement some of their features
> in MediaWiki without following their protocol? That is where we
> should be worried. What exactly is it that they have patented?
>
>
> --
> Lars Aronsson (l...@aronsson.se)
> Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
