Digitizing isn't really that hard. You take a scanner, upload an image, label it, repeat.
________________________________ From: Durova <nadezhda.dur...@gmail.com> To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 9:28:28 AM Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] foundation-l Digest, Vol 64, Issue 51 2009/7/18 Durova <nadezhda.dur...@gmail.com>: > Put me in touch with instructors at art schools and I'll incorporate > restoration into their curriculum. You'll be surprised how scaleable this > is, particularly if we work out exhibition opportunities. > > -Durova Restoration isn't the problem for the most part. The English part of the National Monuments Record contains about 10 million items (mostly photos I think). Wales and Scotland ad few million more. That includes a fairly complete public domain aerial survey of the UK from the 1940s. We do not have the capacity to support digitalization on that scale. -- geni ---- Are you talking about our capacity or their capacity? The Library of Congress has 14 million items and has been digitizing since 1994. It's an ongoing process; they've developed excellent protocols. http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/about/techIn.html -Durova -- http://durova.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l