Well yeah Milos - but we probably won't - will we! - Seems a bit silly. I was hoping we could have a thread about the principle of discussing / evaluating some of the various voluntary codes of conduct out there - perhaps someone is aware of a US standard (is that what you're getting at, Geni - that the location of the servers is probably the most important factor?)
cheers, Peter, PM. On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Milos Rancic <mill...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:21 AM, geni<geni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2009/8/7 private musings <thepmacco...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Just wondering what folk think about the WMF heading towards compliance > with > >> things like this; > >> > >> http://www.gsmeurope.org/documents/eu_codes/fsm_code_en.pdf > >> > >> This is a german code of conduct - but there are many more (I've also > spoken > >> with these chaps =- http://www.iia.net.au/ - and I got the feeling that > >> they'd very much like to engage with both communities, and the > foundation as > >> the 'service provider') > >> > >> My interest stems from discussing sexual content on wikimedia foundation > >> projects, but obviously engagement with such external bodies / codes of > >> practice etc. is far from limited to that sphere, > >> > >> best, > >> > >> Peter, > >> PM. > > > > > > Is based on German law so no. There are rather a lot of other flaws > > but that one is a complete killer. > > We may consider to use Saudi Arabia and North Korea laws, too. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l