On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 2009/8/25 Anthony <wikim...@inbox.org>: > > Occurring on the same day may imply "related" but it does not, beyond a > > reasonable doubt, equal "sold". If it did, we'd have a whole lot more > > prostitution convictions. > > As I've already said, whether or not it was sold is irrelevant, it > *looks* like it was sold, and that is a big problem. "How can you have a Q&A on a topic like this that doesn't even address the matter than you have sold a seat on the board?" That's the comment I was referring to with my wife beating statement. Anyway, I'd be much more concerned if the money had gone not to the foundation, but to a board member's for-profit corporation. Even if it is quid-pro-quo, so what? This ain't a community run foundation, people. On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Anthony<wikim...@inbox.org> wrote: > > Occurring on the same day may imply "related" but it does not, beyond a > > reasonable doubt, equal "sold". If it did, we'd have a whole lot more > > prostitution convictions. > > ... it could be reliably determined, but I don't think anyone is going > to give Kohs 2million dollars to spend on a seat. You really think they'd give it to him? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
