Thomas Dalton wrote: Hmmm 22.30 UTC is a shitty time for people in Asia and Australia as well ... but why bother about them. It is all about Europeans and Americans isn't it?
W > 2009/9/29 Angela <bees...@gmail.com>: > >>>> 2130 UTC sounds a little late to me if we want Europeans there. We're >>>> on daylight saving time for another month (ish), so in Western Europe, >>>> that is 2330, finishing at 0030. That's pretty late. >>>> >> I thought the idea of having two meetings is that at least one would >> work, not both. So, the European meeting is on Thursdays at the >> earlier time. >> > > Yes, but 2130UTC was proposed as a good time for Europeans. The > original time of 2230UTC is presumably better if Europeans aren't a > factor. > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > > > > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
